Equal Rights: Dred Scott v. Roe

In writing about the need for Christians to be active in fighting for the rights of the unborn, John Piper makes a striking report,

On March 6, 1857, the Supreme Court, in Dred Scott v. Stanford, ruled that no act of Congress or territorial legislature could make laws banning slavery. The fundamental argument was that slaves are not free and equal persons but the property of their masters. The ruling is analogous to Roe v. Wade because today no state may make a law banning abortion to protect the unborn. The argument is similar--basically because the unborn are at the sovereign disposal of their mothers and do not have personal standing in their own right. There was no consensus in this country on the personhood and rights of slaves. We were split right down the middle. But the issue was so fundamental that the states went to war, and in the end the Lincoln administration overturned the Dred Scott decision. And today, 130 years later, we look back with amazing consensus and marvel at the blindness of our forefathers.

--John Piper, Brothers, We are Not Professionals